How Many Lives Has Animal Testing Saved

• 100'southward of millions of creature tests are performed each twelvemonth
• People's republic of china and the USA are the worst proponents of animal testing
• The European union has had a cosmetic testing ban in place since 2013

Animal Testing Facts and Statistics Overview

The number of animals used in unnecessary, vicious testing continues to be extraordinary.

Whilst the verbal figures are hard to come by – understandable when you consider the negative PR countries and companies know they'll receive – it's important to us that nosotros shed a calorie-free on industries that proceed to turn a profit from such vile practices.

Particularly ones like cosmetics – vanity industries where there's absolutely no demand to examination any product on animals. That'due south why nosotros shine a light on so many wonderful cruelty-gratuitous companies – that we've tested, trust and thoroughly recommend.

Peak 11 Most Frightening Animal Testing Facts and Statistics

ane. It is estimated that the USA performs well over 100 1000000 tests on animate being each year

Because America's Animal Welfare Deed (AWA) doesn't include the animals that are primarily used for testing – rats, mice and fish – the figures are wildly underestimated. The latest figures accounted for 780,070 tests.Whereas the number is more than likely effectually the 115 million mark.

ii. Simply over xx% of the world'southward countries have cosmetic national testing bans in place

41 countries have completely banned cosmetic testing on animals –this includes all of the European union– whilst some other 17 are working on it.

3. Beast testing in Australia increased by 148% between 2015 – 2017

Whilst Commonwealth of australia has recently implemented a national cosmetic testing ban, Queensland recorded over 12 million tests on domestic fowl in 2017 without a specified purpose.

You can detect out more about animal testing in Australia here.

4. More than than 90% of compounds tested on animals fail to enter the marketplace

More than contempo studies approximate animal testing has a 96% failure charge per unit as it's predictability has reduced.

5. Some brute tests take years to complete and cost multiple millions of dollars

Rodent cancer studies are particularly expensive and time-consuming. They can cost $2 – 4 million per two-species lifetime study.

6. In that location are 50 validated and – in part – accepted alternatives to animal testing

Typically alternatives to fauna testing are incredibly effective at reducing the number of animals used as they're more than cost and time-efficient. In some cases they tin be 97% more cost effective (see rat 24 calendar month bioassay vs Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cell transformation test).

seven. The United states of america spend nigh $20 billion of taxpayers money every year on animal testing

47% of the NIH's budget for all testing projects in the United states of america is spent on funding animal testing.

8. 84,100 animals died in the Britain in 2019 every bit a result of beast testing

9. Almost 700,000 animals died across the Eu in 2017 as a result of animal testing

Of the ten,664,752 procedures performed on animals across the European union in 2017, half dozen.4% were non-recoverable and a further 10.vii% (1.14 1000000) were classes equally'severe.'

10. 100% of HIV vaccines that passed brute tests failed in humans

Of the almost 100 HIV vaccines that passed animal tests, none of them proved successful in human trials.

After HIV vaccine gp120 failed in clinical trials, a BMJ article distinguished how the important differences between NHPs (not-human primates) and humans had led researchers down a doomed path.

11. 79% of people say they would switch if they found out a brand tested products on animals

Withal still brands continue to get downwards this route – Source: BUAV Poll

How Many Animals are Tested on each twelvemonth Globally?

Ultimately 100'due south of millions of animals are tested on each twelvemonth.

The worst proponents of animate being testing are China, The The states, Australia and Japan. Significantly. Information technology is likely these 4 countries make up over 50% of all tests on animals beyond the world.

Number of Animate being Tests Performed by Country

The 9 Countries that perform the nigh Tests on Animals each twelvemonth

Country	Number of Animal Tests per Yr
USA**	100 – 120 meg
China*	24 million
Australia***	xx one thousand thousand
Japan	18 one thousand thousand
Canada	3.eight million
South Korea	iii.7 million
UK	3.4 one thousand thousand
Germany	2.8 million
French republic	1.ix million
(European union	10.nine million)

*China is notoriously difficult to gather creature testing statistics from as it's quite a closed book. However nosotros took data from Cruelty Costless International and applied a 20% increase – an increase in line with the rest of the countries on our listing (excluding the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland)
**The United states of america is every bit difficult to extrapolate accurate animate being testing data. According to the Usa Regime statistics, just 780,070 animals were used in tests – a 5.7% increase from 2017. But as the US has no ban in place, these statistics do not include all animals. Most mice, rats, and fish are non covered past the Fauna Welfare Act – though they are even so covered by other regulations that protect animal welfare. And so the broad ranging figure of  up to 120 million is a best estimate for the number of animals used in US laboratories.
***Australian animate being testing has exploded in recent years. This has been driven past the use of 12 million domestic fowl in Queensland in 2017. The total number of animals used in 2017 (20.2 million) jumped from 12 million in 2016. Alarming figures to say the to the lowest degree.

How Many Countries Have Animal Testing Bans in Place?

At that place are 40 Countries with National Cosmetic Testing Bans in place as of 2021. Which is xx.5% of the earth's nations.

And then in that location are a further 17 countries working on implementing bans – some other 8.7%. What complicates the upshot are countries like Brazil and The USA where in that location are partial bans in place. And nosotros hateful partial.

In Brazil, only vi of the 26 states accept approved a ban for cosmetic animal testing. And the USA is even worse. In America, only 5 states have banned cosmetic animal testing.

Countries like Canada still don't take whatever bans on cosmetic fauna testing.

Animal Testing Statistics in the UK

Testing corrective products and their ingredients on animals was banned in the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland in 1998 as part of EU Regulation 1223/2009 (cosmetics regulation).

The ban was created because non-beast methods were developed to test the safety of the cosmetics AND vanity products cannot be classed in the same bracket as testing on legitimate medical products.

You can read more than about the UK's animal testing policy hither.

See how theEuropean Cosmetics Directivedefines a cosmetic or vanity product:

---

"Any substance or grooming intended to be placed in contact with the various external parts of the human trunk (epidermis, hair organization, nails, lips and external genital organs) or with the teeth and the mucous membranes of the mouth with a view exclusively or mainly to cleaning them, perfuming them, changing their advent and/or correcting body odours and/or protecting them or keeping them in good condition."

— European Cosmetics Directive

---

4 Major Animal Testing Facts and Statistics in the UK

Every year the Great britain authorities publishes a report on the scientific procedures that occur on living animals.

This gives us the opportunity to analyse the electric current state of play in our ain country and to see how animal testing has developed over the years.

1. 3,400,000 Procedures on animals in 2019
2. 86% of the animals were mice, fish and rats
3. 16,100 Personal licenses handed out to test on animals
4. 84,100 Animals died as a result

Now, in that location are three licences required by the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 before testing on animals is immune. The 3 licences needed are:

1. A personal licence for each person conveying out procedures on animals
2. A project licence for the plan of work
3. An establishment licence for the identify at which the work is carried out

So whilst the number of tests are reducing slowly across the UK, the number of applications forpersonal licenses is, at best, concerning.

Animal Testing Facts and Statistics in The European union

• The UK runs the most tests on animals in the European union, followed by France and Germany
• six.iv% of all animate being tests were not-recoverable – the field of study died
• In 2017 at that place were over ten million tests on animals in the European union

Since 2013 the EU has implemented a ban on cosmetic animal testing.

However there are still millions of animals built-in specifically for testing each year and – between 2013 and 2017 – the number of authorised projects has increased by 176%.

And during this timeframe, the number ofinspections – announced or unannounced – barely increased at all. As 70% of adults in EU countries concord that replacing brute testing with non-animal methods should exist an EU priority, nosotros will continue to

4 Creature Testing Statistics in the Eu

1. 10,664,752 Procedures on animals in 2017
2. 92% of the animals were mice, fish and rats
3. six.4% of all tests performed were non-recoverable
4. 10.7% of all tests performed were classed as 'severe'

What Animals were used for Animal Tests in the European union

In 2017, the main species used (for the outset fourth dimension) in research and testing in the EU were: mice, fish, rats and birds.

Which together represented 92% of the total number of animals while species of detail public concern (dogs, cats and not-homo primates) represented less than 0.three% of the full number of animals. The same amount as amphibians, cephalopods and reptiles.

Simply every bit the number of animal tests across the European union has increased by 16% between 2017 – 2020, we can utilize the same increase to get estimates (albeit authentic estimates) for how many animals were used for the first time in 2020:

• Mice: 6.6 million
• Fish: ane.4 million
• Rats: 1.28 one thousand thousand
• Birds: 0.64 million

Animal Testing Facts and Statistics in The USA

• The USA arguably has the worst and to the lowest degree transparent beast testing policy
• The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) doesn't cover mice, rats or fish – the most widely used animals in research
• Estimates put the number of animals used in animal testing at well over 100 one thousand thousand per year

1. 99% of animals involved in tests aren't included in the Brute Welfare Act
2. $19.6 billion spent by the NIH on animal research and testing in 2020
3. 90% of animals aren't included in official statistics
4. 7% of animals weren't given any pain relief

In 2019, US regime statistics put the number of laboratory animals used in research at 797,546, an increase of 2.2% from 2018.

However, because these statistics practice not include mice, rats, and fish- animals non covered by the Animal Welfare Act – they are wildly inaccurate. Estimates claim that the number of mice and rats alone is 111.five million.

Nosotros accept a more detailed breakdown on animal testing in the USA hither.

Public Perception Statistics of Animal Testing

Americans…
Who oppose beast testing for scientific purposes
52%

Source: Pew Research

If a brand tested on animals…
79% Of people would switch

Source: BUAV Poll

In the Great britain…
38% Believe that cosmetic testing is legal

Source: Section for Energy, Business & Industrial Strategy – Public Attitudes to Brute Research

65% of the British Public tin accept creature testing for medical enquiry…
IF there'south no culling

Source: Department for Energy, Business & Industrial Strategy – Public Attitudes to Animal Research

Those who believe that cosmetic testing on animals is permitted in the UK are just as likely every bit the rest of the public to say they tin accept the employ of animals in medical research. This context-driven nature of support for animate being research needs to be well-documented.

If we're all more aware of societal laws and in particular the aplenty number of alternatives to animal testing, we can move towards a kinder world that no longer supports animal testing in whatever forms.

What % of Creature Tests are fifty-fifty 'Successful?'

• A test could last up to two years and at that place could be 2,000 animals involved
• More than 90% of compounds entering clinical trials neglect to gain regulatory approving
• Testing a single active pesticide ingredient takes a decade, costs approximately $71,000,000 and kills upwards to 8,000 animals to complete all of the brute studies required to register i single pesticide

For drug testing lonely the average time to bring a product to market place is x-15 years.

With a current failure rate of 90% – 55% due to a lack of efficacy and 28% due to the toxic effects in humans – the need for more efficient, sustainable technologies in chance assessment over current paradigms is and so blatant it's difficult to comprehend how such barbarian processes are kept alive.

What does the Future agree for Animal Testing?

It'south not all doom and gloom. There are some initiatives designed to reduce the number of animals involved in testing around the world.

The Future of Animal Testing in The United states

EPA has moved away from requiring the testing of potentially harmful chemicals on animals. A decision that hasn't gone down well with numerous research groups and environmentalists.

The Due east.P.A. Administrator Andrew Wheeler said the bureau plans to reduce the amount of studies that involve mammal testing past 30 percent by 2025, and to eliminate the studies entirely by 2035.

---

"We are really excited as this has been something we've wanted for quite some time…The alternatives are the future. They're more efficient and relieve lives.."

— Kitty Block, President of the Humane Club of the USA

---

The Futurity of Animal Testing in China

Even Mainland china, a country lambasted for it's arroyo to animal testing, is looking at loosening steps regarding corrective testing on animals.

In July 2020 Communist china'south National Medical Products Assistants (NMPA) began formulating new restrictions that are believed to lift the animal testing requirement. One that requires any cosmetic sold in the land to exist tested on animals.

Information technology'southward the reason why companies that sell in China cannever be labelled every bit cruelty-costless. And why we'd never trust brands who trade their humane responsibility for some quick yen.

Whilst it'south unclear exactly what is likely to happen, nosotros'll take whatever progress we can regarding China's animal testing policies.

The Future of Brute Testing in The EU

So whilst testing cosmetics on animals has been banned in the United kingdom since 1998 and the European union ban on beast tested cosmetic products was first passed in 1993 – with the full ban taking effect in 2013 – there are still millions of animate being tests that occur each year.

ten.9 million to be verbal!

Merely co-ordinate to data provided by Cruelty Gratis Europe, 70% of adults in EU countries concord that replacing animal testing with non-fauna methods should be an Eu priority. With such stiff public backing, we're confident that any not-essential animal testing will soon be made illegal across all EU states.

Additional Sources

The Canadian Council on Animal Intendance

Recherche Animale Research Statistics

Humane Club International – South Korea

Laboratory Animal Statistics in Frg

Source: https://redorangepeach.com/animal-cruelty/statistics/

Posted by: brownleehatterouble.blogspot.com

Share this post